Celebrity tattoo artist Kat Von D emerged victorious in a highly-anticipated copyright infringement trial over her iconic Miles Davis tattoo. Jurors unanimously concluded that Von D’s tattoo, along with her related social media posts, did not possess substantial similarities to the copyrighted portrait of the legendary musician.
The trial held at the Guam District Court also addressed three other social media posts by Von D, which were deemed as fair use. This ruling, for Von D, was met with immense relief and gratitude, as she believed it would help protect the entire tattoo industry.
Plaintiff Jeffrey Sedlik, who sought damages for willful infringement, expressed disappointment over the verdict and announced plans to appeal the decision. Sedlik’s lawyer argued that Von D’s tattoo displayed significant resemblance to the original photograph of Miles Davis. On the other hand, Von D’s lawyer emphasized that artists cannot copyright camera angles or gestures.
During the trial, Von D’s legal representation also pointed out that the tattoo in question was a gift and was not reproduced for profit. This aspect played a crucial role in the jury’s decision-making, according to an expert who suggested that Von D’s personal connection with the jurors might have influenced their verdict.
Four jurors involved in the trial echoed the sentiment that the verdict was obvious, with Von D unwaveringly defending her position. Their statements further highlighted the confidence and conviction displayed by the tattoo artist throughout the proceedings.
Von D’s trial attracted significant attention as it was seen as a potential test case for fair use. This anticipation was fueled by a recent Supreme Court decision, which rendered it more challenging to prove fair use. The ruling in question centered around Andy Warhol’s painting of Prince, which was found to have violated copyright.
As Guam News Factor closely followed this high-profile trial, stay tuned for more updates on the appeal process and any potential implications this verdict may have on the tattoo industry and fair use laws.
“Prone to fits of apathy. Devoted music geek. Troublemaker. Typical analyst. Alcohol practitioner. Food junkie. Passionate tv fan. Web expert.”