Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer has recently spoken out against the current direction of the Court in a candid interview. Breyer, who retired from the Supreme Court last year, expressed his concerns about the court’s current trajectory and emphasized the importance of taking a pragmatic approach to interpreting the Constitution.
In his upcoming book, “Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism,” set to be published on March 26, Breyer elaborates on his views on constitutional interpretation. The Justice highlighted his belief that the Constitution should be viewed as a living document that adapts to modern times.
The interview with Breyer took place in his former Supreme Court chambers, which, while not as grand as before his retirement, still hold significance for the Justice. Breyer’s message comes at a critical time as the Supreme Court prepares to hear a major abortion case regarding access to pills used for termination of pregnancies.
Breyer’s remarks have sparked discussions among legal scholars and practitioners about the direction of the Supreme Court and the impact of judicial appointments on the interpretation of the Constitution. Many are eagerly anticipating the release of Breyer’s book to delve deeper into his thoughts on this important subject.
As the Supreme Court continues to grapple with complex legal issues, including the contentious abortion case, Breyer’s words serve as a reminder of the pivotal role that the Court plays in shaping the future of our country.
“Travel aficionado. Incurable bacon specialist. Tv evangelist. Wannabe internet enthusiast. Typical creator.”